<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This PDF form restricts some operations.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.4xpdf.com/2009/08/this-pdf-form-restricts-some-operations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.4xpdf.com/2009/08/this-pdf-form-restricts-some-operations/</link>
	<description>PDF News, PDF Articles, PDF Tips and PDF Rants on ... PDF!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:59:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joaquin Menchaca</title>
		<link>http://www.4xpdf.com/2009/08/this-pdf-form-restricts-some-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-2871</link>
		<dc:creator>Joaquin Menchaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 23:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4xpdf.com/?p=1865#comment-2871</guid>
		<description>Leonard, Thank you for the information.  I wish there was a tool to analyze the PDF document, so I could figure out why I get the error message.

But what I am wondering though, is how is that string displayed.  It must from the PDF right?  Thus, the PDF is blocking content?

I tried a PDF with Apple&#039;s Mac OS X Preview, and I get the same text:

To view the full contents of this document, you need a later version of the PDF viewer. You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader from www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html

For further support, go to www.adobe.com/support/products/acrreader.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leonard, Thank you for the information.  I wish there was a tool to analyze the PDF document, so I could figure out why I get the error message.</p>
<p>But what I am wondering though, is how is that string displayed.  It must from the PDF right?  Thus, the PDF is blocking content?</p>
<p>I tried a PDF with Apple&#8217;s Mac OS X Preview, and I get the same text:</p>
<p>To view the full contents of this document, you need a later version of the PDF viewer. You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader from <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html</a></p>
<p>For further support, go to <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/products/acrreader.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/support/products/acrreader.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard Rosenthol</title>
		<link>http://www.4xpdf.com/2009/08/this-pdf-form-restricts-some-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Rosenthol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4xpdf.com/?p=1865#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>Chris is partially right (at least from what I can tell from your simple screen shots and w/o an actual link to a PDF).  The form _IS_ an XFA-based PDF created by Designer BUT it does NOT have any custom encryption - just standard password encryption.

As such, the PDF is FULLY COMPLIANT with ISO 32000-1 which fully documents both the encryption algorithms and include XFA as a normative reference.

Unfortunately, at this time, only Adobe Acrobat &amp; Adobe Reader are fully conforming readers according to the requirements of ISO 32000-1.  At such point as other readers upgrade to fully support the requirements of that standard, then they too will be able to view that form w/o the need for the message.

So don&#039;t blame Adobe - they did NOT do anything wrong.  Instead, talk to the manufacturers of the other viewer(s) you tried and get them to support the open PDF standard.

Leonard Rosenthol
PDF Standards Architect
Adobe Systems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris is partially right (at least from what I can tell from your simple screen shots and w/o an actual link to a PDF).  The form _IS_ an XFA-based PDF created by Designer BUT it does NOT have any custom encryption &#8211; just standard password encryption.</p>
<p>As such, the PDF is FULLY COMPLIANT with ISO 32000-1 which fully documents both the encryption algorithms and include XFA as a normative reference.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, at this time, only Adobe Acrobat &amp; Adobe Reader are fully conforming readers according to the requirements of ISO 32000-1.  At such point as other readers upgrade to fully support the requirements of that standard, then they too will be able to view that form w/o the need for the message.</p>
<p>So don&#8217;t blame Adobe &#8211; they did NOT do anything wrong.  Instead, talk to the manufacturers of the other viewer(s) you tried and get them to support the open PDF standard.</p>
<p>Leonard Rosenthol<br />
PDF Standards Architect<br />
Adobe Systems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.4xpdf.com/2009/08/this-pdf-form-restricts-some-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4xpdf.com/?p=1865#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>This is standard behavior for LiveCycle created / protected (DRM&#039;ed) PDF files. It&#039;s been around for years (yes, even locking users out of PDF files completely).

The issue here is that the creator of the PDF decided to lock in their DRM solution to Adobe (similar to those who use FileOpen, who again only create a plugin for use with Adobe products).

Perhaps Adobe needs to make the side-effects of their PDF protection schemes more clear, but LifeCycle is a very popular solution for big business with few alternatives (because it provides content protection password based encryption can&#039;t and it unlocks features in Adobe Reader not usually available).

You should probably be mad at the PDF creator / publisher, not Adobe, for locking themselves into a proprietary solution.

How SHOULD big business get around the limits of the most popular PDF reader? Turn to PDF based web applications such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pdfescape.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PDFescape&lt;/a&gt;.

Note: This web application won&#039;t open your problematic files, but it will help a company from creating them in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is standard behavior for LiveCycle created / protected (DRM&#8217;ed) PDF files. It&#8217;s been around for years (yes, even locking users out of PDF files completely).</p>
<p>The issue here is that the creator of the PDF decided to lock in their DRM solution to Adobe (similar to those who use FileOpen, who again only create a plugin for use with Adobe products).</p>
<p>Perhaps Adobe needs to make the side-effects of their PDF protection schemes more clear, but LifeCycle is a very popular solution for big business with few alternatives (because it provides content protection password based encryption can&#8217;t and it unlocks features in Adobe Reader not usually available).</p>
<p>You should probably be mad at the PDF creator / publisher, not Adobe, for locking themselves into a proprietary solution.</p>
<p>How SHOULD big business get around the limits of the most popular PDF reader? Turn to PDF based web applications such as <a href="http://www.pdfescape.com" rel="nofollow">PDFescape</a>.</p>
<p>Note: This web application won&#8217;t open your problematic files, but it will help a company from creating them in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4xPDF Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PDF and Adobe PDF</title>
		<link>http://www.4xpdf.com/2009/08/this-pdf-form-restricts-some-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>4xPDF Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PDF and Adobe PDF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4xpdf.com/?p=1865#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>[...] post is on a topic related to my previous post. A rant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post is on a topic related to my previous post. A rant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
